I posted this comment:
Isn’t the technology adoption life cycle by its very nature misleading? Since it depicts adoption, the actual number of users is not shown.
If the “late majority” is as numerous as the “early majority,” doesn’t that make the values of the groups equal? E.g. Blogs have more visitors than social hubs at the moment, since the cumulative number of users (or cumulative user acceptance) is greater. Or, big family V8s make more money than fuel efficient cars.
Isn’t this kind of a paradox?
